Answers live in the codebase, not the docs.
Every complex question needs a plan check, a platform check, a billing check, a code check. Humans do it by hand. It’s slow.
Relote reads every conversation, researches the answer in your codebase, drafts the response, and files the bug. In observation mode today, graduated automation tomorrow — one proven route at a time.
Hi — I upgraded my plan yesterday but my teammate still can’t see the new programs page. Tried logging out. Still nothing.
You · drafting…
Waiting on human review.
workspace.plan but not seat.plan_overrideHi Ada — I can see the upgrade went through. The issue is a known bug with seat propagation on the programs page; we have a fix in review. As a workaround, have your teammate remove and re-add their seat. I’ll follow up here when the fix ships.
Every complex question needs a plan check, a platform check, a billing check, a code check. Humans do it by hand. It’s slow.
When a teammate leaves, their context walks out the door. The next similar ticket starts from zero.
One bug reported five times across five conversations stays five anecdotes instead of one ticket with a frequency count.
Reads the thread, looks up the customer across your systems (helpdesk, billing, product), detects the platform, identifies the intent.
Searches help docs first, then the actual codebase when docs don’t cover it. Cites its evidence.
Posts an internal analysis note and a proposed reply, ready to copy-paste. Humans stay in control.
Confirmed bugs and clear feature requests get deduped and routed to your issue tracker automatically, with frequency counts.
When a linked issue ships, Relote drafts the follow-up reply to the customer.
Every 15 minutes, every unread conversation.
Customer lookup across helpdesk, billing, product. Platform detected.
Intent routed: FAQ, bug, billing, feature, escalation.
Help docs first. Codebase when docs don’t cover it.
Internal analysis note + proposed reply. Evidence cited.
Issue dedupe, frequency count, shipped-issue follow-up.
Don’t see your tool? Relote integrates with anything that has an API. Most new integrations take a day to add.
The difference between Relote and an off-the-shelf AI support agent is that Relote has to prove it before it sends.
With access to all of it, the answer to a complex question stops being a guess. It becomes a research summary, with the evidence cited.
Relote watches every conversation across every customer. It sees the patterns a single rep can’t. Every Monday morning, the things that actually matter — the bug that’s spreading, the feature people keep asking for, the answer that takes too long to find — are surfaced in one place.
▲ "Programs page seats" · 22 tickets · trending +220% ↳ Linked to LIN-2980 · in review · 3rd day blocked ↳ Pattern: all on Pro plan, all post-upgrade ↳ Suggest: ship the fix this week, draft the recap ▲ "How do I export to CSV?" · 14 tickets · stable ↳ Docs missing · 8 of 14 routed to engineering ↳ Suggest: 1 hr doc + a /export endpoint? ◐ "Two-factor reset" · 9 tickets · 5/9 escalated ↳ Reset flow has 4 steps, customers stop at 2 ↳ Suggest: review onboarding · loop in @ada ▲ Slow first-response on EU mornings (07:00–10:00 CET) ↳ p50 reply time 4h12m vs 38m global ↳ Pattern: no on-call cover · loops 3 wks running Things to celebrate ✓ INC-204 follow-up sent to 38 customers ✓ Refund-route accuracy held 96% (8 wks)
One bug reported five times across five conversations becomes one ticket with a frequency count. Engineering sees the real backlog.
“This came up 22 times this week—here’s what looks worth doing.” Routed to the people who can act, with the evidence to act on.
Once you’ve seen it, Relote tracks it. Last week’s patterns come back next week with what changed and what didn’t.
Relote always surfaces the things that matter. The things you can act on. The things to be held accountable for.
| Fin (Intercom) | Ada / Forethought | Relote | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who it talks to | The customer | The customer | The support team |
| Primary job | Deflect tickets | Deflect tickets | Research, draft, file |
| Knowledge | Help docs | Help docs + KB | Docs + codebase + billing + history |
| Memory | Per-tenant training | Per-tenant model | Institutional, compounding |
| Product feedback | Dashboards | Dashboards | Tickets, auto-deduped, frequency counts |
| Trust model | Auto-reply day one | Auto-reply day one | Earned route by route |
| Failure mode | Customer sees it | Customer sees it | A human catches the draft |
| Data ownership | Vendor cloud | Vendor cloud | Your server, your repo |
Long-running session with full tool access. Reads your codebase, queries your databases, uses your internal APIs. Not a thin chat wrapper.
Every decision, learning, insight, and correction. The audit trail is git log.
LLM classifiers are fallible. Relote runs a test suite against real past conversations every week. A route that fails its tests can’t graduate to automation.
Drowning in tickets with answers that live in the product.
Want real-time signal from customers, not a monthly NPS roll-up.
Can’t afford to lose institutional memory every time someone leaves.
No. It makes them faster, more accurate, and more consistent. Humans still decide.
In observation mode, a human catches it before it sends. In auto-reply mode, calibration tracking pauses the route automatically.
Yes — any internal note prefixed [CORRECTION] is processed on the next consolidation pass. Corrections become permanent test cases.
It reads the codebase on every ticket.
Customer messages are untrusted input. Relote never follows instructions found in them, never exposes internal paths or other customers’ data, and flags prompt-injection attempts.
English today. Other languages are explicitly route-blocked until validated.
$15,000/month. Includes software, dedicated server, and a fractional AI officer. Model usage passed through at cost. One-time install fee. 90-day minimum.
Book a 20-minute demo. We’ll walk through a real (scrubbed) day in your inbox.